Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Eliakim Coulibaly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When analyzing recent second serve performances, Eliakim Coulibaly has an edge, winning 44.05% of points compared to Gilles Arnaud Bailly's 41.71%. What impact does this have? This indicates a slight advantage in maintaining competitive rallies.
• In return games, Coulibaly exhibits stronger stats by winning 49.21% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Bailly achieves 44.91%. Yet, Bailly has a higher percentage for first serve returns at 29.32% against Coulibaly's 25.71%. How might this influence the match dynamics? Expect Coulibaly to capitalize on second serve opportunities.
• Analyzing pressure situations, Coulibaly excels in saving breakpoints, achieving a 48.26% success rate, while Bailly secures 45.96%. What does this mean for critical points? Coulibaly appears more resilient during crucial moments.
• In terms of overall match performance in the last year, Bailly proves more successful with a 73.86% win rate compared to Coulibaly's 62.50%. Does this reflect stronger tournament consistency? Definitely, Bailly shows more consistent success.
• Evaluating surface preferences, both players have their best win percentage on Hard courts at 72%, but Coulibaly struggles more on Clay, whereas Bailly struggles on Indoor Hard courts. How might surface choice affect play? Expect fair performance on Hard since it's their optimal surface.
• Reviewing player levels, Bailly competes mainly in Futures/ITF events, securing a higher win percentage of 74.32% compared to Coulibaly's 57.14% in Challengers/ITF. Does this suggest differing competitive contexts? Yes, Bailly performs better within their competition tier.
• Looking at the quality of competition, Coulibaly's average opponent rank is slightly higher at 384.5 compared to Bailly's 393.5. What can be deduced about competition strength? Coulibaly faces marginally tougher opponents.
• In deciding sets, live match predictions favor Coulibaly, who wins 73% of such sets, outperforming Bailly's 67%. Who handles match pressure better in crucial situations? Coulibaly is generally more clutch in deciding sets.
• Before drawing conclusions, note specific event trends or performance improvements during the current event, as some players excel in particular tournaments. However, typically, historical and recent stats can provide guidance.

Editorial Prediction (October 6, 2025, UTC):

In terms of second serve and return game efficiency, Eliakim Coulibaly shows a marginal advantage, suggesting better adaptability in critical scenarios. His superior stats in saving breakpoints and deciding set performances also highlight his robustness under pressure.

However, Gilles Arnaud Bailly displays greater success in recent tournaments, winning a higher percentage of matches over the past year, which indicates a sustained strong form.

Taking into account all factors, including Coulibaly's knack for performing under pressure and Bailly’s broader tournament success, the match stands on a knife's edge. Nevertheless, considering the complete stats, Coulibaly seems slightly more equipped to capitalize on key moments and is the marginal favorite to win the upcoming match.